The tasks to be performed are summarized below

Task 1: Structural Issues. The grand problem is to develop underlying theories and application frameworks for tacit knowledge in the military domain. In order to understand how tacit knowledge is formed, epistemological discourse on sensemaking will be developed with empirical validation experiments supported by cognitive task analysis, work domain theory, abstraction hierarchy, and theories of expertise. Polanyi’s theory of knowledge, Kelly’s Personal Construct Theory, and Herrmann’s Brain Dominance Theory will be used to support the development of a Sensemaking Model Architecture (SMA).

Task 2: Process Issues. The challenge here is to develop processes for capturing and representing multidimensional, interoperable, heterogeneous, and dense battlespace information. Various modalities for sensemaking with these characteristics information will be studied. We shall develop assorted sensemaking process tools using cognitive process and simulation models. Sample tools include, SEAT (Sensemaking Effectiveness Assessment Tools), TCP (Training Capable Package), and SENSEWARE, a decision tool for simulating sensemaking processes. Special attention will be given to cognitive simulation modeling of commander’s intent and C2 tasks for the Army’s emerging adhocracy and Network-centric organizations. The TCP module will be the platform for distributive training of the Future Force military leaders.

Task 3: Adjustment Issues. We will conduct both theoretical and applied research to understand the effects of a decision-maker’s adaptivity to evolving military missions. Researchers will attempt to apply normative models for predicting future system states and apply meta knowledge to solve novel problems. For example, we will populate the SENSEWARE decision aid with constructive models to support the commander and battlestaff deciding when to shift from deliberate to crisis management, or reallocate cognitive resources among competitive tasks. We will examine knowledge structures of military personnel in known task situations and use the information to develop predictive models to capture the behavior of the incumbent system states. Systems theoretic methods for modeling dynamic situation awareness in evolving contexts will be developed.

Task 4: Army Leadership Training and Development. Parallel to cognitive modeling and sensemaking research, we will investigate their impact on training and leadership development of the Army’s Future Force. We will use our findings to develop and/or improve ROTC Leadership curriculum at NCA&T State University. Two primary objectives will be addressed: (i) developing a theoretical framework for understanding the implications of leadership behavior in an information technology driven Army C2 organization and (ii) providing methods for training and assessing performance of higher order leadership skills of commanders in a collaborative, C2 organization.